Need a Steam-only CS2 API?
Review the private beta.
Steam-only observed-candidate catalogue, explicit availability, and recorded history.
Compare the private PriceForge beta against your current provider without assuming broad current coverage, public self-service, lower costs, or immediate migration.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
// Compare your current provider with the staged Steam-only beta contract const currentProvider = await fetch("https://other-api.example/prices/ak47"); // Candidate PriceForge request shape const priceForge = await fetch( "https://api.priceforge.dev/api/v1/prices/AK-47%20%7C%20Redline%20(Field-Tested)", { headers: { "X-API-Key": "px_your_api_key" } } ); const payload = await priceForge.json(); // Review whether structured unavailable states fit your migration plan if (priceForge.status === 404) console.log(payload.availability.status);
Why developers are switching
Steam-only contract
Review a simpler staged contract focused on observed Steam catalogue candidates, explicit availability, bulk status responses, and recorded history instead of unsupported market-count or scaling promises.
Truthful blocked work
Broader current support, faster tiers, and billing remain evidence-gated and blocked, so migration decisions can start from an honest contract instead of roadmap marketing.
Migration review
Use the beta to judge whether the Steam-only request and response shapes fit your workflow before planning a migration.
Evidence-backed scope
The beta only claims the capabilities already proven in staging, so your evaluation starts from a truthful contract rather than a marketing comparison.
What the beta can prove today
| Evaluation area | PriceForge beta | Current provider | Question to validate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access model | Private beta invitation | Your current terms | Does invited access fit your rollout? |
| Current endpoint behavior | Eligible current observation or structured unavailable | Your current endpoint behavior | Can your integration handle explicit unavailable states? |
| Bulk/status handling | Observed catalogue plus reconciled statuses | Your current bulk contract | Do you need broader authority than the staged cohort? |
| Billing state | Closed during beta | Your current billing | What evidence would you need before switching later? |
| History support | Recorded history for a bounded cohort | Your current history access | Can you prototype with recorded history first? |
| Migration decision | Defer until after beta review | Already in production | Would a truthful beta still be worth testing? |
Evaluate in 3 simple steps
Apply
Tell us about your current provider and what you need from observed catalogue candidates, explicit availability states, and recorded history.
Review the contract
Compare the staged request and response shapes with your integration before changing any production code.
Prototype safely
Test against the invited beta first, then decide later whether a migration is worth planning.
Want us to review your migration fit?
Apply for private beta review. We'll tell you honestly whether the current Steam-only contract fits your workflow.
Apply for Beta Review